Sign in or 

|
tres_chic_133 |
40. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 22 2008, 3:43 PM EST
"tres_chic_133, i completely agree with everything you said! i think people would have been happy to sit through a longer film if it made it more like the book. "Thank you =) I mean, Titanic was how long? How many people, still to this day sit through it over and over again. Here's hoping that the next one's are better! 1 out of 1 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Morkie |
41. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 23 2008, 4:28 AM EST
"Thank you =) I mean, Titanic was how long? How many people, still to this day sit through it over and over again. Here's hoping that the next one's are better!"i totally agree with you. and wasn't one of the harry potter movies and lord of the rings like 3 hrs long. i would have rather sat in a movie theater satisfied rather than sit through a too short movie and be dissapointed form missing a lot of things. I blame summit and their stupid budget cuts and time limits. first twilight, then catherine, and now maybe even taylor. ugggggggggggggggh Do you find this valuable? |
|
3abed00 |
42. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 23 2008, 10:22 AM EST
i liked twilight 2 much and i still having dejection from that movie Do you find this valuable? |
|
icewater11 |
|
|
icewater11 |
44. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 25 2008, 4:47 PM EST
hey,no bumming my fav. movie please.everything ABOUT twilight ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
Ouroborus |
45. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 26 2008, 8:22 AM EST
I hope they can do some effects like XMEN or something similar for the whole end of the book, hopefully by then they will have a substantially increased budget.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
twilightwatcher |
46. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 26 2008, 11:39 AM EST
Same here but personally I found Twilight a great movie.Although, some special effects wouldn't go amiss.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Morkie |
47. RE: breaking dawn
Dec 30 2008, 11:57 PM EST
don't you think suri cruise would be a really good renesmee if she could talk and was a little bit smaller?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
twilightwatcher |
48. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 1 2009, 1:18 PM EST
I don't know who Suri Cruise is. What does she act in?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
steffie90 |
49. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 1 2009, 2:28 PM EST
"I don't know who Suri Cruise is. What does she act in?"she's the daughter of tom cruise and i don't think she has actually acted in anything Do you find this valuable? |
|
Emmettsgrl642 |
50. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 1 2009, 4:03 PM EST
i dont think soo Kristin and Rib sould also do breaking dawn together
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
affame |
51. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 1 2009, 8:05 PM EST
"Hmmm........i do not know.I hope that does not stop them.i love the movies.do u Know when New Moon is coming out?just message me if u know."New moon is comming out November 20, 2009! Do you find this valuable? |
|
Reneetwilightmom |
52. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 1 2009, 8:24 PM EST
"i dont think soo Kristin and Rib sould also do breaking dawn together"So explain to me why you feel this? I think it would be a poor desision to make Breaking Dawn with different people! But in 3 or 4 years when it takes place they might not like young enough for the part! I still like Rob and Kristen in the parts and think they were perfect! And lots of people think Kristen didn't fitnthe part of Bella I think that is crazy! She was awesome as bella! Do you find this valuable? |
|
stmerry |
53. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 12:13 AM EST
"i dont think soo Kristin and Rib sould also do breaking dawn together"me to think that they should, so what if they become older if they can make renesmee from CGI tahn they suppost to able to make Kristin and Robert look younger. and they MUST make the Break Dawn the movie or the movies if it`t what take to make it more perfect. Do you find this valuable? |
|
twilightwatcher |
54. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 10:47 AM EST
Three or four years really won't make that much of a difference. I think that Rob and Kristin should stay for all of the movies, they have such wicked chemistry!
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
forrestfllower68 |
55. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 12:32 PM EST
yaa they should be together all the way through
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
steffie90 |
56. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 5:03 PM EST
"Three or four years really won't make that much of a difference. "rob is already to old to play edward now cos he is 22 not 17 so in 3 or 4 years there is no way he could be in the films (in my opinion) Do you find this valuable? |
|
Ouroborus |
57. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 8:08 PM EST
Think about the technology they have today, they can make older people look younger, and younger people look older. It is not a far stretch to think that they can keep the same actors play the same characters and maintain the age group, as well as possible make a character resembling both to make renesmee. I mean do you know anyone that looks like golum from LOTR or Yoda from Star Wars..
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
twilightwatcher |
58. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 2 2009, 9:12 PM EST
Absolutely true! Rob makes an excellant Edward but I was wondering, what about the rest of the Cullensfamily. Will they stay the same, also?
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Ouroborus |
59. RE: breaking dawn
Jan 3 2009, 12:25 AM EST
For consistency in the story they would have to. I would love to see Jacob transform to a werewolf similar to those in Underworld. The could use similar aging techniques to make him older looking and taller for each movie.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you?
|